IP at the Supreme Court Series: NetChoice LLC v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice LLC

Feb 26 | 5:00 - 6:30pm EDT | Hybrid | Reception to follow
Registration Required
Moderated by Professor Michael Carroll
헤라카지노 Washington College of Law regularly invites counsel of record and counsel for selected amici to offer post-argument reflections in intellectual property (and related) cases heard by the Supreme Court. These events are held on the afternoon of oral argument before the Court.
Issue
Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment prohibits viewpoint-, content-, or speaker-based laws restricting select websites from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech - or otherwise burdening those editorial choices through onerous operational and disclosure requirements.
,
Issue(s): (1) Whether the laws’ content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment; and (2) whether the laws’ individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment.
Panelists
- Corbin Barthold, TechFreedom, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of NetChoice/CCIA.
- Rupa Bhattacharyya, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Neither Party.
- Scott Wilkens, Knight First Amendment Institute, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Neither Party.
- Emily Hockett, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of NetChoice/CCIA
- Ari Holtzblatt, WilmerHale, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of NetChoice/CCIA
- Catherine R. Gellis, Amicus Curiae Brief on behalf of Bluesky, M. Chris Riley & Copia Institute, in Support of NetChoice/CCIA
- Professor Stephen Wermiel, 헤라카지노 Washington College of Law
All Briefs Available on SCOTUSblog:
Update:
Decision:
Accommodation Request
If you would like to request disability-related accommodation or accessibility information, please contact PIJIP at pijip@wcl.american.edu. Requests should be made two weeks before the event date.